1.06.2010

Top ten Traction news stories of 2009

Well, the year's not over yet, but I've got some time before the turkey's ready and lots to be thankful for. Here's a wrap-up of Traction's top news stories of 2009.

1. Traction wins 2009 Interactive Agency of the Year :: BtoB Magazine (Apr 6, 2009) - My favorite story hands-down. Traction named the # 1 digital agency in the U.S.

2. Top interactive agencies benefit from shift online :: BtoB Magazine (Apr 6, 2009) - Traction is highlighted in this article covering shops with a digital edge.


3. Traction pulls ahead :: San Francisco Business Times (Dec 1, 2009) - Full-page feature on Traction after we were named #51 on the list of the Fastest Growing Companies in the Bay Area.

4. Social Media Agencies to watch :: iMediaConnection (August 17, 2009) - Traction was one of four agencies noted for "Moving beyond the experimental phase" in social media


5. Alibaba.com Plans U.S. Push :: WSJ (Aug 7, 2009) - Traction's campaign for Alibaba.com featured in the Wall Street Journal

6. "China's eBay" targets U.S. entrepreneurs :: CNN (Aug 14, 2009) - While CNN wrongly describes Alibaba.com in the title (people who sell on eBay find stuff to sell on Alibaba!), they describe the work well—"The creative is earnest and funny—you may even laugh out loud at Dave, the action figure proprietor"—earning them a spot on my list.

7. Inc. 500 | 5000, No. 1,399 Traction :: Inc. Magazine (Sep 24, 2009) - This was a great accomplishment. Check out my post about my experience at the Inc. 5000 Conference.

8. Ad Industry Innovator: Traction :: Hitch (Apr 21, 2009) - Traction was the first agency highlighted in this series on advertising innovators on the Hitch blog.

9. Designing Minds: Traction :: Adobe TV (Jun 8, 2008) - OK, this was 2008, but I love it and it's video, so it's making my list. Traction was featured in this brief documentary video produced by Adobe.




10. Interview with Susan Bratton :: DishyMix - Last, but definitely not least, I was interviewed by marketing diva Susan Bratton about "Building a Successful 21st Century Agency" on the DishyMix podcast.

Digital marketing resolutions for 2010

If nothing more, 2009 was a year for everyone in this godforsaken industry to reflect. For most, it was a year of tremendous struggle. That's OK. That which does not kill us makes us stronger. And we're far from dead.

I had the good fortune to see Jim Collins, the author of "Good to Great" at the Inc. 5000 Conference (Traction was proud to be No. 1,399 on the list) a few months ago. He gave some sage wisdom to the crowd:

Don't just have a to-do list. Keep a not-to-do list.

That's wisdom I've taken to heart, so I've kept my list of resolutions this year to a list of not-to-dos.

So, what did we learn? What can we do about it next year? I run an agency, and here's a list of my New Year's resolutions.

1. Do not gain back that five pounds.
2009 was a year of belt-tightening for everyone. It forced many of us to become more operationally efficient. We became a lean, mean, interactive experience-producing machine.

As business picks up in 2010, I'm going to make sure my agency is running a streamlined operation.

2. Do not build silos.
A long time ago, agencies were not quite sure what to do with this whole "internet thing," so they created little silos filled with hairy, tattooed kids and kept them around the corner from the "real" creatives that wrote the TV spots and print ads. I was one of those kids and thought this was utterly stupid.

So stupid, in fact, that we started our own agency that was born integrated -- we had one team that produced ideas and then thought about how best to execute them across channels. Now, many of those "traditional" agencies are crumbling. Who was right?

Today, agencies are not quite sure what to do about this whole "social media thing," so what are they doing? You guessed it. Silos.

Not this guy.

3. Do not tell my clients it's the year of mobile.
Mobile is myopic. It's a tactic, not a strategy.

The real trend is that people are empowered to consume media and content on their own terms. Mobile devices, netbooks, interactive television, digital billboards -- screens are everywhere we look. Brands need to be thinking about how they can produce content people want to consume and how they can distribute it as efficiently as possible to all of these channels.

I say it's the year of distributed consumption.

4. Do not talk the talk without walking the walk.
It's very easy for us to read a few articles on social media, add the word "guru" to our LinkedIn profiles, and start talking about transparency as keys to success in social media.

But how many agencies are actually being transparent in how they do business?

Just as transparency has become an expectation of consumers in their interactions with brands, it is becoming an expectation of brands in their interactions with agencies. The agencies that try to hold onto their smoke and mirrors in 2010 will be in for a struggle.

5. Do not believe the recession is over.
For some of us, 2009 was actually a good year -- perhaps because we were in the digital place at the right time. Perhaps because we were more willing and able to change with the market. For many, a flurry of new business activity in Q4 has us feeling optimistic about the economy coming back in 2010.

Optimism is good. Over-confidence, however, can be a brutal mistake.

The global economy is shifting dramatically and will continue to do so for quite a while. Millions of feet of commercial real estate will become vacant next year, sending new ripples through our financial system.

What impacts will these issues have on our business? Beats me. But, you can bet they will have impacts.

6. Do not train people. Cross-train them.
No, I'm not talking about taking them jogging and then out for a bike ride.

I'm talking about the absolute fact that if your people are not well-versed in multiple aspects of the advertising business, they are simply not prepared to be of valuable service in this day and age. It is not enough to train your people to be great at your job. You need to cross-train them.

Designers need to understand media. Account people need to understand social media. Copy writers need to understand analytics. And you need to set up the means by which they can gain this understanding.

7. Do not give up on big ideas.
There's so much focus on direct response and social media right now that it's easy to forget that great ideas can have a transformative impact on brands.

I was at a client's office the other day, and the company had York Peppermint Patties in the candy dish on the receptionist's desk. I excitedly picked one up and said to my co-worker, "When I bite into a York Peppermint Patty... " How many years has it been since I've seen that commercial? Fifteen? Twenty? But it's still embedded deeply in my memory.

And as powerful as ideas have always been at creating emotional resonance between brands and consumers in advertising, they are even more valuable today. Now, the definition of what an ad is has exploded, and a limitless palette of opportunity lies before brands.

An example: Tampax wanted to build connections with young women, but how do you identify with a tampon ad? Well, here's an idea: BeingGirl.com, the online community that is "for girls, by girls" -- and sponsored by Tampax. And hundreds of thousands have shared intimate experiences with one another and with that brand.

Ideas have allowed brands to go far beyond Mr. Whipple. Ideas are what fuel innovation. Innovation fuels growth.

So in 2010, I'm going to be sure to not stop bringing ideas to the brands we work with every chance I get.

This article was originally published on iMediaConnection.com.

12.21.2009

Brizzly Makes a TwitFace

But do Facebook and Twitter belong together?
Another guest post by Carly Schwartz

Of all the social media aggregators out there these days, I was most excited to beta-test Brizzly, and not just because its icon is more adorable than the Snuggle bear. The program promises to simplify online social activity by allowing you to access Twitter and Facebook at the same time, on the same screen. As a longtime user of both platforms for very different purposes, my curiosity piqued. Is it possible to enjoy the benefits of both at once?

Brizzly offers a way to view your Facebook and Twitter accounts on the same webpage, dividing the two programs by tabs. Its clean interface makes for easy navigation of content. Users can even integrate up to five Twitter profiles into their Brizzly account and peruse the individual pages’ activity side-by-side.

Brizzly’s Twitter content looks almost exactly like Twitter’s webpage itself, with minor design tweaks (black stars instead of gold ones for favoring posts, lists moved to the lefthand side of the page instead of the right). Its Facebook content, however, is much more limited, displaying only news feeds, wall postings, and status updates—essentially Facebook’s most Twitter-esque features.



Perhaps the most compelling aspect of Brizzly is its ability to explain Twitter trends. Users simply click “why?” next to a topic, and Brizzly offers a concise explanation in a neat little pop-up box. This saved me the agony of scrolling through streams of 140-character gobbledygook to figure out why #sorrysorry appeared as the number one trend yesterday, as Brizzly quickly informed me it’s a reference to a hit single by Korea’s Super Junior, allegedly the world’s largest boy band. Fascinating stuff, I know.

Other useful Brizzly features include the ability to embed photos and videos into the actual Twitter stream (as opposed to accessing the content on a separate client like Twitpic) and the option of saving drafts of your tweets and Facebook status updates (not sure why anyone would want to, but it’s a nice touch). Its real-time updates feature also saves users from constantly refreshing their page, a flaw that plagues both Twitter’s and Facebook’s original websites.

While most of Brizzly’s positive attributes relate to its Twitter features, the majority of its problems have to do with Facebook. Its Facebook content prohibits users from updating their profiles, playing games, chatting, or engaging with any part of the program beyond the wall. When users click a link to access their Facebook photos, a new window opens up entirely, directing to their actual Facebook pages. Kind of defeats the purpose of accessing Facebook through a separate client.

Brizzly’s successful use of Twitter and limited integration of Facebook begs the question: Do Facebook and Twitter—or any differing social mediums, for that matter—belong together? As social media continues to evolve, will one network reign supreme, or do different programs serve different purposes?

I’ve been actively tweeting for more than a year, and on Facebook since [gasp!] 2004, and I use each platform for very different reasons. Though Facebook statuses are useful every now and then to brag about an impending vacation or vent about a tough day at the office, for me, the program is a vehicle for keeping in touch and communicating with friends. Whether chronicling photos, planning a party, playing a game of Scrabble, stalking a crush, or indulging in general vanity, Facebook is best suited as a means to socialize in the digital space.

Twitter, on the other hand, is an information aggregator extraordinaire. I use Twitter to read the news, stumble upon discounts, follow my favorite musicians and artists, share interesting tidbits, and monitor the general pulse of San Francisco. Of course, a few friends and I call each other out on inside jokes and upcoming plans, but I prefer to use Facebook for that.

Furthermore, as a member of the ad industry, I believe tools like Brizzly inhibit the potential to develop marketing programs across social platforms. Successful social campaigns take very different forms on Facebook (games, fan pages, gifts) than they do on Twitter (hashtags, retweets, customer relationship management). Integrating the two poses a significant challenge for marketers, who clearly want to move beyond display banner ads as the social space continues to grow.


Despite Brizzly’s earnest attempt to blend the two programs, I think they’re ultimately better off alone. Social networks will continue to grow and find their respective footings in the coming years. For now, there’s a place for Facebook and a place for Twitter, and although some of their features overlap, I’m not convinced they belong next to each other—even when joined by a mascot cute enough to turn my insides to oatmeal. 




Happy holidays from Traction!

12.11.2009

A Creative Alien at the iMedia Agency Summit

This is a guest post written by blogger Renee Crawshaw, Associate Creative Director at Traction.

I've just returned from the iMedia Agency Summit in Scottsdale. On my first day, a group of four Summit veterans took us newbies aside to tell us what to expect in the coming days. Afterward, I asked the group of 40 or so freshmen if there were any other creatives present. Not a single hand raised. It was plain to see: I wasn't in Kansas anymore.

Now, to be fair, the iMedia Agency Summit is the opportunity for agency media planners and buyers to meet with digital publishers and technology providers. But as the person who is ultimately responsible for communicating ideas through digital media, it's important that I understand their capabilities. That's why I jumped at the chance to go. And I encourage more creatives to get their names on the invite lists of future Summits. Here is a bit of what I took away.

Collaboration, education, and standardization.
At the Summit, these three ideas were meant to apply to the relationships between media agencies, publishers, and clients. From a creative person's point of view, I say that they apply to how we here at Traction approach a project. We employ cross-discipline collaboration, starting at the concepting phase. In addition to the copywriter and art director, our brainstorms include our UX designer and our technical leads. This organic ebb and flow of expertise from each discipline results in experiences that generate visceral responses and reflect natural human behaviors on the web.

Traditional, digital, social: it's all a big blur.
Deelish, isn't it? I'm a copywriter by discipline. Nine years ago I felt my advertising career was all but wrapped. The San Francisco ad scene was decimated by the dot com implosion. And this new-fangled thing called online marketing limited me to a character counts and static executions. Today, technology has caught up to what I do—and is pretty transparent to me. Not only can I work in my familiar territories like video (for you traditionalists, that's what used to be known as "broadcast"), I now have a host of new channels in which I get to tell a brand's story. At the Summit, we heard a lot about the importance of developing original content for interactive video. I'm looking forward to it.

It can be messy at times. All these options. All that content. None of us quite speaking in the same language. But to the consumer, it all mashes up to a yummy dish of relevance.

12.09.2009

Trends with Traction at the iMedia Agency Summit: Have agencies become commodities? - iMedia Connection Blog

iMedia Connection Blog: Trends with Traction at the iMedia Agency Summit: Have agencies become commodities?

12.01.2009

Traction pulls ahead

San Francisco Business Times just published this article on Traction. You can read the original here.

Ad firm Traction's software supports creative side



As far as Adam Kleinberg is concerned, there are ad agencies and there are software companies. Traction Corp. is one of the few that blurs the line between the two.

“We work across integrated branding and advertising, interactive experiences and social media to create experiences and align human behaviors with the brands,” said Kleinberg, founder and CEO of San Francisco-based Traction. “We’re as much a software development company as we are an ad agency.”

This model of combining advertising principles with web applications has worked for Traction. Over the past three years, the company has grown 105.5 percent, to $3.7 million last year from $1.8 million in 2006.

Illustrating this is a campaign the company created for Adobe in 2008 that involved a Facebook application that allowed users to guess if an image was an original or modified using Adobe’s Photoshop software.

“They wanted to reach out to the college student audience, so we created a game called ‘Real or Fake’ that leveraged images created with Photoshop,” Kleinberg said. “It provided a really successful brand engagement for Adobe’s customers.”

Kleinberg said the company tries to align a brand’s business objectives with human behavior through something it calls “engineered marketing.” The traditional marketing that had audiences move from awareness to consideration to intent to purchase doesn’t work anymore because “consumers can consume media on their own terms,” Kleinberg said.

The company’s blend of traditional and interactive ad experience led to an identity crisis early on, said Kleinberg, who has a web design background. “Were we a web development agency or an ad agency?”

But Kleinberg and the company’s other founders, Theo Fanning and Paul Giese, who all worked together at Tribal DDB before founding Traction in 2001, decided they were both and decided to combine the two.

The lines were blurred further when Traction was hired by Bank of America to create an Internet application that allowed customers to engage with the BofA brand while investigating their personal finances through the bank’s web site.

“It was truly different from anything the bank had ever done before,” said Tim Brown, who was creative director for Bank of America’s e-commerce division. He has since moved to a similar position with Kaiser Permanente.

“Instead of just taking what we thought would be a good idea, they really went to town and did great research on how people view their finances,” Brown said.

Kleinberg said 2008 was the company’s best year, and despite a tough beginning to 2009 he expects the company to come out of the recession stronger.

“At the beginning of this year, we had two months where most of our clients froze and we were very touch and go,” Kleinberg said. “But things quickly picked back up and we’ve grown quite a bit this year.”

Kleinberg said that through the third quarter, the company was on a path for more than 40 percent growth compared to the same period last year, despite the lull. He said the recession has made the firm focus on companies that value their brands, choosing clients more selectively.

As a manager, Kleinberg has learned that the most difficult aspect of managing the firm has been hiring good people.

Traction has grown to about 30 employees, with 12 of them joining in the past three years. Kleinberg estimates that he will hire about 10 more in the next three years. He said he took one of the company’s biggest risks when he decided to keep a particularly cohesive team even after the project they were working on was canceled.

Among Traction’s competitors are San Francisco firms such as AKQA and Organic, Kleinberg said.

“The team knows that we really care about them and I would say to a man when the need comes to put in that extra effort and put in a long night, people don’t hesitate to make that happen,” said Kleinberg, who thinks the risk paid off. “That’s been something that has made us a stronger company.”

11.06.2009

Twitter Lists to Followers Ratio: The new social media metric

Twitter has been aunching a slew of new functionality recently, most notably Twitter Lists. I say most notably because Twitter Lists addresses one of the most pressing problems with using Twitter.com as a primary Twitter client. It's very easy to follow so many people that you wind up really following no one. People's tweets just get lost in the stream.

Until now, I've solved that problem with 3rd party apps like Seesmic on my desktop and Tweetie on the iPhone that allow me to create groups of followers so I can filter down tweets to a manageable thread and actually keep tabs on the people I'm most interested in. Twitter Lists, however, allows me to do that right on Twitter.com and even better, share those lists with others. The lists I aggregate can become little tidbits of value I share with the masses.



That's really relevant to brands seeking a meaningful metric for how to measure the success of their social marketing programs. Just acquiring followers is really quite meaningless. It's relatively easy to do (follow a bunch of people and some subset will just follow you back), but says nothing about the relevance of those followers or if they are getting any value out of following you.

However, if someone adds you to a list, they are making a small, but conscious effort to say to the world, hey this dude's got some good tweets over here.

I propose that this will evolve into a truly meaningful metric for social marketing effectiveness. The more of your followers that put you on Lists, the more relevant and valuable your social media presence is. As of this moment, @adamkleinberg (that's me) has 1852 followers and I'm on 60 lists. That means I have a marginally respectable 3.2% List to Followers Ratio. This is a measure of my perceived relevant value on Twitter, and one I hope will improve over time.

There are holes in this theory of course. Take this Twitter thread for instance:

jack_benoff: @adamkleinberg but how many of your followers have even created lists?

adamkleinberg: Lists to Followers Ratio = new value metric for soc. media. Currently 3.2% of my followers think I'm valuable enuf 2 put on a list.


But even if this is brand new stuff and only active Twitterers use it, doesn't that add to the argument that it's a great metric to measure value of your Twitter presence? It's no secret that ninety-something percent of people on Twitter sign up, tweet once and disappear. Those aren't exactly valuable followers and they definitely aren't creating lists.

Stick that in your PowerPoint and guru it. As always, I love to hear your thoughts.

11.04.2009

Marketing Megatrends redux

The "5 Marketing Megatrends You Cant Ignore" article I wrote for iMedia last week has gotten quite a bit of buzz. I did a search on twitter and nearly 400 people have tweeted about it since it was released on Monday (writing this on Wednesday). It's fascinating how Twitter allows you to watch something "go viral" in real-time.

It's also spawned a few interesting blog posts around the web. I thought I'd collect a few links to them here.

When Do Megatrends Matter? by Small Business Labs:
"What's interesting about these "new" megatrends is all have been talked about, at least in the trends community, for many years - even decades. This does not mean the list is bad or late. Trends take a long time to reach the point where they matter.

One of the key indicators that a megatrend is starting to have broad impact is discussion and activity across multiple disiplines. All of these trends have reached that point - and all of these trends matter or are starting to matter to small businesses."


Five “Megatrends” to Watch by Ed Lee at Blogging Me Blogging You:
"For discussion: is mass collaboration the answer for pervasive distrust in big corporations? It is interesting that big corporations are deliberately using social media to both seem smaller and encourage that collaboration.

We use the following formula when explaining this stuff to clients:

Engagement = Transparency + Co-Creation


5 Marketing Megatrends by Healthcare Strategist
"#4 is, I think, under-appreciated in health care. Doctors and hospitals like to think of themselves as the last of the white hat-wearing good guys, and maybe they are. But trust is a funny thing - built over decades and lost overnight. Screw it up and watch the laser beam of populist rage move from Wall Street to Medical Avenue."


sarica’s posterous
"I like the difference the author establishes between "regular" trends and "mega" trends, this is a quite interesting article... althought it takes a small effort to read it."


Five Megatrends--and how they are shaping crisis communication
"I'm once again stealing brilliance from others, but, hey, isn't that what blogging is all about?
Here's a very insightful article about the Five Megatrends impacting marketing. But these are also impacting crisis communication and the way we think, work, socialize and exist together in community. So here is my crisis communications take on these big ideas..."


Megatrends also drive new funding models
"I would say #1, #3 and #4 are exactly things we thought when we founded Grow VC. 1. Collaboration is needed for funding. 3. New funding models must be global. 4. Startups are important for growth and entrepreneurs don’t feel that large VC’s and banks are always the best source to get funding. I think #2 and #5 are also linked to the funding world.

We can always be sceptical with trends and especially with megatrends. But together with very practical experiences from the startup world, I see these trends are definitely shaping the funding models of the future."

11.02.2009

5 marketing megatrends you can't ignore - iMediaConnection.com

"I just wrote this article for iMedia Connection and it's gotten some buzz (I measure buzz by retweets these days — this one got over 90 the day it was published). I'd love to hear your thoughts in comments."
Our society is undergoing massive fundamental transitions. Learn how these forward-thinking brands seized the underlying marketing opportunities.